•  AQAR Information
Criteria 2- Teaching- Learning and Evaluation (350) 
Key Indicator- 2.1 Student Enrolment and Profile (40)  Weightage  2020-21 2021-22      
2.1.1  QnM Average Enrolment percentage (Average of last years)   20 2020_21_2_1_1        
2.1.2  QnM Average percentage of seats filled against seats reserved for various categories (Average of last years)   20 View        
Key Indicator- 2.2. Catering to Student Diversity (50) 
2.2.1 Qlm special Programmes for advanced learners and slow learners 30  View        
2.2.2 QnM Student- Full time teacher ratio (Data for the latest completed academic year) 20 View         
Key Indicator- 2.3. Teaching- Learning Process (50) 
2.3.1 Qlm Student centric methods, such as experiential learning, participative  20  View        
2.3.2 Qlm Teachers use ICT enabled tools for effective teaching-learning  15 View         
2.3.3 QnM Ratio of mentor to students for academic and other related issues 15  View        
Key Indicator- 2.4 Teacher Profile and Quality (60) 
2.4.1 QnM Average percentage of full time teachers against sanctioned posts during the last five years  20          
2.4.2 QnM Average percentage of full time teachers with Ph. D. during the last five years  (consider only highest degree for count)  20          
2.4.3 QnM Average teaching experience of full time teachers in the same  institution (Data for the latest completed academic year in number of years) 20          
Key Indicator- 2.5. Evaluation Process and Reforms (30) 
2.5.1 Qlm Mechanism of internal assessment is transparent and robust in terms of frequency and mode  15 View        
2.5.2 Qlm Mechanism to deal with internal/external examination related grievances is transparent, time- bound and efficient    15 View        
Key Indicator- 2.6 Student Performance and Learning Outcomes (60) 
2.6.1 Qlm Programme and course outcomes for all Programmes offered by the institution are stated and displayed on website and communicated to teachers and students. 15

 PoC

  SPoC

 
       
2.6.2 Qlm Attainment of programme outcomes and course outcomes are evaluated by the institution 15          
2.6.3 QnM Average pass percentage of Students during last five years  30          

 

 

 

 

 

Criteria 2- Teaching- Learning and Evaluation (350) 
Key Indicator- 2.1 Student Enrolment and Profile (40)  Weightage  Data Templets  Supporting Doc 
2.1.1 QnM Average Enrolment percentage (Average of last five years)   20  Download File  2.1.1 Supporting Document
2.1.2 QnM Average percentage of seats filled against seats reserved for various categories (Average of last five years)   20  Download Data Templets 2.1.2 Supporting Document
Key Indicator- 2.2. Catering to Student Diversity (50) 
2.2.1 Qlm special Programmes for advanced learners and slow learners 30  Advance Leaner Student

Slow learners 

 

2.2.2 QnM Student- Full time teacher ratio (Data for the latest completed academic year) 20 Download Data Templets    2.2.2 Supporting Documents
Key Indicator- 2.3. Teaching- Learning Process (50) 
2.3.1 Qlm Student centric methods, such as experiential learning, participative  20  Download Data Templets  2.3.1 Supporting Document
2.3.2 Qlm Teachers use ICT enabled tools for effective teaching-learning  15  Download Data Templets  2.3.2 Supporting Documents
2.3.3 QnM Ratio of mentor to students for academic and other related issues 15

 Number of Student enrolled & Teacher

Mentor Mentee Ratio

 circulars assigning mentor to mentees
Key Indicator- 2.4 Teacher Profile and Quality (60) 
2.4.1 QnM Average percentage of full time teachers against sanctioned posts during the last five years  20  Download Data Templets  2.4.1 Supporting Documents
2.4.2 QnM Average percentage of full time teachers with Ph. D. during the last five years  (consider only highest degree for count)  20  Download data Templets  2.4.2 Supporting Documents
2.4.3 QnM Average teaching experience of full time teachers in the same  institution (Data for the latest completed academic year in number of years) 20   Download Data Templets  2.4.3 Supporting Documents
Key Indicator- 2.5. Evaluation Process and Reforms (30) 
2.5.1 Qlm Mechanism of internal assessment is transparent and robust in terms of frequency and mode  15    2.5.1 Supporting Documents
2.5.2 Qlm Mechanism to deal with internal/external examination related grievances is transparent, time- bound and efficient    15    2.5.2 Supporting Documents
Key Indicator- 2.6 Student Performance and Learning Outcomes (60) 
2.6.1 Qlm Programme and course outcomes for all Programmes offered by the institution are stated and displayed on website and communicated to teachers and students. 15

 PoC

  SPoC

CoP

 Programme & Course Outcome
2.6.2 Qlm Attainment of programme outcomes and course outcomes are evaluated by the institution 15    2_6_2 Supporting Documents
2.6.3 QnM Average pass percentage of Students during last five years  30  2_6_3_Average_pass_percentag  2_6_3_Supporting Documents
Key Indicator- 2.7 Student Satisfaction Survey (60)
2.7.1 QnM Online student satisfaction survey regarding teaching learning process of about 20% student 60  Student Satisfaction Survey